A governance expert has sparked a debate with his bold prediction: the current Electoral Commission (EC) Chair and deputies are destined for removal, just like their predecessor, Charlotte Osei. Dr. Richard Fiadomor's endorsement of the Constitution Review Committee's (CRC) proposal to introduce fixed tenures and post-service restrictions for EC leadership has ignited a conversation about the politicization of the EC.
The CRC's proposed amendment to Article 223 of the 1992 Constitution aims to address this very issue. It suggests a single, non-renewable term of 10 years or until the age of 65 for the Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners, with a three-year post-service restriction on holding public office.
Dr. Fiadomor argues that this system will shield the EC from undue influence and prevent the manipulation of Commissioners by politicians. He cites the removal of Charlotte Osei as an example of a politically motivated action, based on what he describes as flimsy excuses.
"The current EC Chair, Jean Adukwei Mensah, and her deputies are likely to face a similar fate," he predicts. "The EC has become a battleground for political parties, with each new government appointing their preferred individuals. This proposal aims to put an end to that practice and ensure the EC's independence."
But here's where it gets controversial: the CRC's proposal is not without its critics. Some argue that a fixed tenure may limit the EC's flexibility and adaptability, especially in times of crisis. Others question whether a 10-year term is sufficient to implement long-term electoral reforms.
And this is the part most people miss: the proposed post-service restriction. While it aims to prevent Commissioners from being influenced by political parties, it also raises concerns about the EC's ability to attract and retain talented individuals.
So, what do you think? Is the CRC's proposal a necessary step towards an independent EC, or does it raise more questions than it answers? We'd love to hear your thoughts in the comments below!
